Married at First Sight’s Olivia Frazer says ‘villain edit’ left her ‘devoured’ and suicidal
Olivia Frazer is dwelling minding her mum’s canine one Saturday evening when she notices one thing odd.
Warning: This story accommodates language that some readers might discover offensive.
A automotive is crawling previous her home. Then it stops, proper in entrance. The doorways open.
“Then I simply hear 4 or 5 middle-aged girls screaming, ‘Olivia, you are a c***. Die, piggy!'”
She’s scared. She does not know who these girls are or how they knew the place she lived.
This was simply one other in an extended line of abusive incidents that Olivia has skilled since she appeared on Australia’s TV screens in 2022. However this one was a lot nearer to dwelling.
Olivia went on Married at First Sight to search out love, however as a substitute, she misplaced virtually all the pieces.
She’s been known as the most-hated actuality TV star in Australia’s historical past. So, how did she come to put on this doubtful crown?
Olivia says she acquired a “villain edit” — the place the present’s makers manipulate the depiction of a participant to color them because the unhealthy man.
Married at First Sight boss Tara McWilliams has beforehand dismissed claims of “villain edits”, saying individuals “get the edits they deserve” and should not wrongly characterised.
Olivia says the trolling she obtained for her depiction left her suicidal, and that in pursuit of rankings, the present deserted its responsibility of care to her.
Her allegations come as the truth TV trade has been rocked by a collection of lawsuits overseas towards a few of its largest names, which onlookers say might change how reveals are made.
The trade is notoriously secretive, with forged and crew muzzled by non-disclosure agreements.
However Olivia is prepared to danger authorized penalties to warn others of the dangers of changing into a actuality TV villain.
So, do “villain edits” exist, and did Olivia get one?
Casting a villain
Married at First Sight, or “MAFS”, is one among Australia’s most-watched actuality tv reveals. The premise is captured within the title — individuals are married off to a stranger, assembly for the primary time on the altar.
The present dubs itself a “social experiment”, following the {couples} from week to week and asking: can a manufactured marriage work?
However because the novelty of the experiment has worn off after a decade on Australian screens, audiences have more and more come for the drama — not simply between the {couples} themselves, however between contestants.
Olivia says when she noticed the adverts for the first-ever Australian season of MAFS, it felt like future.
“I all the time felt I needed to do the present as a result of I used to be going to fulfill the individual that I used to be meant to be with.”
A couple of years later, she noticed that they have been searching for individuals. She was a couple of wines deep, having simply damaged up together with her boyfriend. It was her time.
By then, she was watching the present nightly — an thrilling distraction throughout a troublesome interval finding out for her educating diploma whereas caring for her dying father.
And now, a casting director had seen her half-baked utility and needed to listen to extra.
“I felt picked, for the primary time in my life. And every time I acquired a callback, I might really feel an increasing number of particular.”
However there was a hitch.
“[They] stated to me, ‘We’re nervous we’ll put you within the shark tank, and you do not have a spine.'”
So, determined to get on the present, she advised a narrative of a time she’d “had tooth”. Throughout a distressing friendship break-up, she’d reduce up her bridesmaid gown for a buddy’s wedding ceremony and despatched it to the bride.
It was the gold this system had been mining for.
“I feel that was the place ‘we’ll forged her as a villain’ began,” she says.
Trade insiders say the casting of a TV “villain” can start as early because the audition room.
“The factor that normally will get individuals forged as villains is after they say of their audition tapes, ‘I am a no-bullshit particular person. I am going to simply inform it as it’s,” says a actuality TV editor, talking on situation of anonymity for worry of jeopardising his job.
The editor did not work on MAFS however has huge expertise throughout related reveals.
Olivia would in the end interview 3 times earlier than making it onto the present, and when she did, the bridesmaid story would come again to hang-out her.
“I’ve to inform the story and it will get chopped and adjusted to make it appear like I am this psycho who’s tremendous pleased with this totally outrageous factor that I had accomplished years in the past.”
However she suspects that to forged her as a villain from the outset would have made for a boring story. She believes this system makers needed to shock viewers with a story arc, by introducing her as an angel.
“With Olivia, there’s a sweetness and a vulnerability attributable to the truth that she’s not too long ago misplaced her father,” stated one of many “consultants” that information the {couples} all through the “experiment”.
“She’s gone via numerous heartache in her life — troublesome occasions at dwelling, shallowness points, even struggled together with her weight.”
Olivia says she was bullied for her weight for years and underwent weight reduction surgical procedure at 22. She advised viewers she’d accepted being mistreated in relationships attributable to her low shallowness.
Her then-TV husband, Jackson Lonie, was appalled to listen to this stunning girl who’d selflessly cared for her father had been handled so poorly.
They immediately fell for one another.
“There’s potential for an unimaginable love story right here,” the consultants gushed.
And that does not make for good tv.
‘Not tuning in to look at a tea social gathering’
Based on the trade insiders, after casting, the baiting begins.
“You are taking a bunch of regular individuals and placing them in an distinctive scenario that is going to push them to have intense experiences … that can then generate actual emotional responses,” says the editor.
“Then … you exaggerate them.”
These reveals want drama — and their filming situations are ripe to ship it.
However those self same situations battle to stack up as a optimistic working surroundings.
Members on actuality TV reveals are staff and may be paid round minimal wage.
And this office can really feel a bit like Britney Spears’s expertise of dwelling beneath a conservatorship.
Program makers management most features of individuals’ lives, together with after they can see different individuals, and what they put up to social media. The present may even put up to individuals’ private Instagram accounts beneath their names.
Olivia says for a lot of the “experiment”, she felt like a “naughty child” being “reprimanded” if she strayed too far, and having her private units taken “as a type of punishment”.
Throughout most seasons, individuals are compelled to dwell for weeks with their new spouses, till not too long ago full strangers.
In Olivia’s season, COVID measures additional restricted their actions and prevented them from seeing anybody outdoors of the manufacturing, leaving individuals “stir-crazy”.
“We have been principally inmates,” she says.
When individuals acquired to see one another at a weekly ceremonial dinner, it was like being set free of jail — and alcohol solely fuelled the cabin fever.
Olivia says whereas alcohol was initially capped on the dinner events, in direction of the top of filming, these restrictions disappeared, and issues went, as she says, “tits up”.
However such drama was welcome on set.
“One ceremonial dinner, we have been all having such a beautiful time … to the purpose the place [a program maker] needed to come out and be like, ‘Proper, you guys want to start out drama or we’ll be right here all evening,'” Olivia says.
“Australia’s not tuning in to look at a tea social gathering.”
Finally, it was Olivia’s flip to snap.
The goal of her frustration was one other participant, Domenica Calarco. The argument spiralled. Domenica stood as much as depart. After which, in a second that has gone down in actuality TV historical past, Domenica smashed a wine glass.
The cameras saved rolling.
“I used to be so intimidated and scared,” says Olivia. “And nothing was accomplished to guard us.”
Olivia needed to file a police report and depart the present: “I am an worker, and I ought to be capable of present as much as my place of job with out worry.”
Program makers talked her out of each strikes.
“Issues have been introduced up like, ‘No, [if police attend] then the footage shall be subpoenaed and folks will lose their jobs due to this,'” Olivia says.
“They begin sweet-talking me: ‘You may’t go. You and Jackson are our solely real love connection. When you go, we do not have a present.’
“I simply felt so immensely responsible desirous about leaving.”
Domenica advised Background Briefing she obtained a warning from this system makers following the glass smashing.
Endemol Shine, which produces Married at First Sight, didn’t reply to any of Olivia’s claims about filming situations, or that she was deterred from going to police. Olivia in the end went on to report the incident after filming wrapped.
The notorious nude picture scandal
After the glass-smashing incident, a contemporary controversy arose. For this system makers, it was storyline gold. For the ladies concerned, the choice to play it to a nationwide viewers would have large penalties — for his or her reputations, psychological well being, and careers.
How precisely occasions unfolded has been contested. Based on Olivia, she relayed the glass-smashing incident to buddies, who Googled Domenica to place a face to a reputation.
She says she was having fun with some downtime with different individuals when her buddies despatched via a screenshot of a nude picture Domenica had posted to her personal public social media accounts.
The picture was promoting Domenica’s account on Solely Followers — a platform the place creators can promote grownup content material to subscribers.
Olivia maintains she confirmed the opposite individuals within the room to query why Domenica was allowed public social media accounts, which have been forbidden by their contracts.
She did not see a problem with exhibiting the picture round, because it had been posted by Domenica for the aim of promoting — “so there is not any privateness anticipated in that scenario”.
This system makers prompted one other participant to drop the bomb on the subsequent ceremonial dinner.
Domenica was blindsided and devastated, however defiantly advised the digital camera: “If it is slut-shaming, I am going to put on it like a badge of honour, as a result of ‘My physique, my alternative, b****.'”
Talking with Background Briefing now, Domenica says the very fact the picture got here from her personal public accounts is irrelevant: “I could not care much less the place she acquired it, it is what she then went to do with that picture — to show individuals towards me, disgrace me, all these issues.
“Revenge porn … does not should be somebody’s picture that was given privately, it may be accomplished differently.”
Olivia knew as quickly because it performed out on the ceremonial dinner that she had “ruined her life”.
She says she was “crucified” by the present’s “consultants” for exhibiting the picture to different individuals.
The following day, she “couldn’t cease crying” and requested to see the present psychologist.
She says program makers advised her that first, she wanted to finish a job: writing a letter providing relationship recommendation to Domenica.
This was not an try by this system makers to mediate the battle between the pair.
“They needed me to jot down all these set off phrases, to criticise Dom’s voice, and principally simply incite extra of a feud,” Olivia says.
When she did get to see the psychologist, Olivia says their skilled recommendation was to spend the weekend together with her TV husband, Jackson, so he might take care of her.
However program makers had one other plan. The couple was tasked with spending the weekend aside — and Olivia says they took her units so she could not contact anybody.
Left alone, she spiralled. Later that evening, Olivia says she advised a workers member her “life was over” and she or he needed to “fling [herself] off a balcony”.
“I used to be positively suicidal, and it was fully undermined and never taken significantly,” she says.
Endemol Shine didn’t reply to the declare Olivia’s units have been taken, however her mum, Sandy, says she did not hear from her till the subsequent day.
“She wasn’t allowed to contact Jackson in any respect,” Sandy says.
“So the very factor that the psychologist stated, ‘it will maintain you protected’, was then taken away from her. And that is from a woman who stated that she needed to leap off a balcony.”
The present psychologist advised Background Briefing they may not remark attributable to their non-disclosure settlement. Endemol Shine additionally declined to remark.
Within the present, viewers should not advised of Olivia’s breakdown. As an alternative, she is portrayed as a clingy girlfriend struggling to spend an evening alone.
Crafting the monster
Within the actuality TV manufacturing course of, after the casting of villains and the baiting for villainous behaviour, comes the enhancing.
It is within the post-production suite {that a} villain edit can really come to life.
It is foreshadowed within the opening pages of Olivia’s contract, which Background Briefing has seen:
“You could or is probably not proven in a optimistic mild; You could be proven in a method you take into account to be embarrassing or in any other case unfavourable; Your look on this system might lead to others seeing or treating you in a different way.”
The truth TV editor who spoke with Background Briefing says these clauses give editors an “open licence”: “[Participants] have actually signed away their rights of reply or criticism.
“There are villains and there are heroes, and folks shall be forged into these roles, and then you definately’ll edit based on these roles.”
The editor says there are a couple of methods to attain these characterisations. The best one is being selective in what will get included.
“The lovable princesses may truly be actually bitchy and say numerous imply issues, however that is not the character that we would like them to be. So you will not embrace their bitchy issues and also you simply make them look lovable,” the editor says.
“After which you’ve gotten villains who are supposed to be actually nasty … and generally they are not, and you actually should push to attempt to make them villains.”
The editor remembers one time this felt “uncomfortable and ethically questionable”.
“We ended up simply form of bullying them — taking a bunch of feedback about how bizarre they have been and making enjoyable of them in a method that did not really feel significantly good.”
The second approach editors use is amplification — discovering a second amongst what the editor calls the “boring crap” that may be boosted right into a storyline.
In Olivia’s case, program makers seized upon a dialog about Jackson going to the gymnasium 5 nights every week.
Within the present, it is spun as a serious battle.
After which, the drama is additional enhanced with a method known as “frankenbiting”.
Like Frankenstein creating his monster, editors will combine collectively unrelated parts from the footage to make their very own beast.
When Olivia met Jackson’s buddies, they requested how she felt about his popularity as a celebration boy: “I do not really feel superb about that — he is a grown man, not a frat boy,” she stated.
Within the present, Olivia’s reply is spliced onto the dialogue of Jackson’s gymnasium routine.
“These two fully completely different conversations acquired meshed collectively in order that I used to be saying Jackson wasn’t allowed to go to the gymnasium, he isn’t a frat boy. He is acquired to develop up,” Olivia says.
And it isn’t simply phrases that get spliced collectively out of context: this editor says it is photos too.
In Olivia’s case, she seems crestfallen as she watches Jackson work out — but it surely’s not as a result of she disapproved of his ardour, because the present narrates.
“I might stated, ‘Please do not movie me within the gymnasium at any level,'” she remembers.
“I am doing my finest to not cry as a result of I am pondering, ‘They’re placing me in a gymnasium so that every one of Australia can chortle on the chubby lady understanding.'”
Between the glares on the gymnasium and the “frat boy” feedback, Olivia’s storyline was full: she was the loopy spouse, threatened that her husband had a interest moreover her — and prepared to undermine his well being because of this.
“To be in one among these reveals after which watch what comes out on the different finish, I feel can be very unusual,” the truth TV editor displays.
Endemol Shine didn’t reply to Olivia’s declare that she was misrepresented within the gymnasium storyline. Married at First Sight boss McWilliams has beforehand advised the Each day Mail: “We do not manufacture storylines or characters. What you see is a mirrored image of completely what’s occurred on the present.”
Controlling the narrative
When the present lastly goes to air, the ultimate section of a villain edit begins: controlling the narrative.
Now, program makers strive to make sure that no narratives that contradict the edit make it into the media.
“They might remind me in a really threatening method earlier than each single media interview that I had signed a [non-disclosure agreement],” Olivia says.
This turns into an issue for Olivia, as a result of when the present goes to air, the backlash is swift.
When the nude picture storyline airs, all hell breaks free.
A petition is launched arguing that Olivia ought to be reported to the eSafety Commissioner for “image-based abuse”. About 120,000 individuals signal on.
A second petition calls for she be prevented from working with kids as a instructor — her life dream.
Domenica information a police report, and Olivia engages a high-profile defamation lawyer, costing hundreds.
Olivia is summoned to a gathering with HR on the college she works for. Fearing what’s coming, she presents to resign. Her educating profession was over earlier than it had even begun.
“My mum’s a instructor. If I had completed my educating diploma, I might be an eighth-generation instructor,” she says.
“They made me appear like a legal on the most important present in Australia. And I did not signal as much as be framed as a legal.
“I signed as much as doubtlessly be a little bit of a b****, that is OK, however to be framed as a legal?”
Even Olivia’s mum, Sandy, was waking to messages from strangers saying, “it is best to have aborted your youngster” and “she killed her father, did not she?”
“I in all probability felt like vomiting for a few months straight each day,” Sandy says.
As Olivia turned more and more suicidal, her mum, Sandy, reached out to the present.
When a consultant phoned her, there was “completely no sympathy”, Sandy says.
“She did say to me, ‘Oh, Olivia’s accomplished worse issues than what you have seen on display screen’ or one thing.
“I completely thought that was a menace.”
Endemol Shine declined to touch upon this interplay. Olivia says she did obtain some periods with an impartial psychological well being skilled, who she felt was ill-equipped to advise on this magnitude of trolling.
For the penultimate episode, Domenica hosted a viewing social gathering with posters of Olivia’s face crossed out. A few of Olivia’s former buddies from the present joined in because the MC incited a cheer from the group: “Can I get a ‘one, two, three, F*** OLIVIA!”
‘You’ll change on the opposite aspect of this’
Olivia will not be the one particular person to expertise suicidal ideation after showing on a actuality present.
Within the UK, the suicide of former Love Island contestant Mike Thalassitis led the nation’s media regulator to rule that British reveals should shield the psychological well being of forged members.
Rebecca Trelease was as soon as a actuality TV star herself.
“I needed to expertise the enjoyment I watched on TV for a lot of my life,” she explains.
“However I additionally thought they’d see us as people nonetheless. I assume I used to be naive.”
Since her personal “villain edit”, she’s spent years finding out the trade, together with what researchers have dubbed “post-reality TV stress syndrome”.
“You change into actually enveloped on this world,” she explains.
“You are not allowed telephones and also you’re fully reduce off so you can’t have any perspective anymore.
“And so whenever you rapidly exit that manufacturing, you’re very a lot by yourself. For me, I had numerous panic assaults. I misplaced like 12 per cent of my physique weight within the two weeks after being eradicated, it was that hectic.”
Very similar to PTSD, individuals discover themselves triggered by issues they affiliate with the manufacturing.
“Placing on make-up would really feel like I am about to be filmed. I am about to be interrogated. I discovered myself all the time checking if I had a microphone on, and it is like this fixed panic, ‘Am I being surveilled?'”
“It must be acknowledged that there’s something traumatic, you’ll change on the opposite aspect of this.”
Through the audition course of, contestants are topic to a psychological screening course of. However Dr Trelease says this could truly be weaponised towards them.
“When you have been to push again at any level and say, ‘I have never been capable of deal with being on the present’, it is like, ‘Ah, however you’ve gotten a medical certificates saying you could possibly be!’
“It is by no means seen as ‘clearly the present has accomplished this’. It is by no means the present.”
Dr Trelease says there is a rising motion within the US to unionise individuals, beneath the slogan “Forged members are individuals, not props”.
In a landmark 2019 ruling, Australia decided that actuality TV individuals have been staff entitled to compensation for psychiatric accidents inflicted by reveals.
However the actuality TV editor says within the edit suite, little has modified.
“I do not know if I’ve ever heard anybody be overly involved with the contestants’ psychological well being.
“We’re not psychopaths, and we’re not making an attempt to harm individuals or something, however more often than not I feel there’s this angle of, ‘They know what they’ve signed up for … so we’re simply going to make the most effective present that we are able to.'”
Life as a TV villain
Following the printed of MAFS, Olivia spent months suicidal and unable to search out work.
So, in an ironic twist, she turned to a discussion board that would not care that she was a villain: OnlyFans — the platform on the centre of the nude picture scandal.
Inside a couple of days, she says she made tens of hundreds of {dollars}. However within the flurry, one factor led to a different.
“I went past my boundaries actually rapidly. And whenever you do this, you all the time should escalate,” she says.
“I’ve posted some issues that I want I might take again.
“It will influence the remainder of my life, what I’ve accomplished for OnlyFans.”
Olivia is uncertain she will proceed with OnlyFans, however says she’s nonetheless unable to get an everyday job — individuals nonetheless shout from automotive home windows when she walks down the road, or glare at her in cafes.
“If I used to be educating, I might be so pleased with myself. Even after I was simply an admin assistant, I might watch the children get higher and higher and be so pleased with them.
“There’s nothing with OnlyFans that I am actually pleased with.”
It has been greater than two years since MAFS first aired. However each time Olivia thinks the hate is cooling off, the present comes out in a brand new nation.
“I feel the final nation it aired in was Sweden. And I solely discovered that out as a result of I began getting demise threats in Swedish.”
On the flip aspect of the feud, Olivia’s nemesis, Domenica, can be struggling: she advised Background Briefing she’s presently in a psychological well being care facility “working via the trauma” of the previous few years, together with how the picture scandal performed out within the public eye.
“It is loopy: everybody’s speaking about what occurred on that present at lunch for 4 months of the yr,” she says.
“I think about [Olivia] was going via that very same [scrutiny and abuse] however 10 occasions worse.
“It isn’t about who’s a villain or who’s a hero — there is not any winner right here.”
Olivia’s mum, Sandy, fears her daughter will “by no means escape how she’s been portrayed”.
“I am not going to defend all the pieces that she did, and she or he has to put on that. However whenever you have a look at this season and you have got a man who was a world drug smuggler and it hardly raises an eyebrow, and then you definately’ve acquired Olivia, who did not like the truth that somebody smashed a glass at her and that acquired pitched to being a girl-versus-girl battle — I’ve an actual drawback with that.”
Olivia says she will take accountability for “what I stated, and what truly occurred”.
“However whenever you’re that low and that darkish and so they know they’re chargeable for placing you there, and … they only allow you to be devoured… Yeah, there’s one thing actually f***ing mistaken with that present.”
This story comes from ABC’s Background Briefing program. Observe the podcast on the ABC pay attention app.
RN in your inbox
Get extra tales that transcend the information cycle with our weekly publication.
